Comments on: Word Processing: Heavy Metal Style https://hackaday.com/2025/10/20/word-processing-heavy-metal-style/ Fresh hacks every day Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:26:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Stephen https://hackaday.com/2025/10/20/word-processing-heavy-metal-style/#comment-8197208 Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:26:47 +0000 https://hackaday.com/?p=868668#comment-8197208 In reply to John Frazer.

Printing with movable type in China really didn’t work very well because of the number of character required. Instead of sorting through 100 or so, you might have tens of thousands; instead of alphabetical order, they had to be sorted by their rhymes and perhaps by the number of strokes they contained. Movable type really only works well with an alphabet.

]]>
By: John Frazer https://hackaday.com/2025/10/20/word-processing-heavy-metal-style/#comment-8197154 Tue, 21 Oct 2025 06:24:35 +0000 https://hackaday.com/?p=868668#comment-8197154

But the revolution was when the Chinese and, later, Europeans, realized it would be more flexible to make symbols that you could assemble texts from. Moveable type. The ability to mass-produce books and other written material had a huge influence on society.

This is a misrepresentation of history. Yes, movable types were invented in China by Bi Sheng around 1040 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movable_type). But their use was rather limited. The oldest book printed with movable types is only from 1377, over 300 years after the invention. So, no revolution. Books continued to be printed with the block-cutting technique for the next 900 years in China, until the late 19th century. Gutenbergs invention, by contrast, though being 400 years delayed compared to China, only took decades to spread across Europe. In fact, it took over so fast, we have a specific term for ‘books printed with movable type until 1500’: incunable (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incunable). It is estimated that around 500,000 exemplars from those early days of printing survive, and this is from before printing really took off in the 1500s.

]]>
By: Titus431 https://hackaday.com/2025/10/20/word-processing-heavy-metal-style/#comment-8196925 Mon, 20 Oct 2025 22:47:50 +0000 https://hackaday.com/?p=868668#comment-8196925 In reply to Stephen Keller.

I know several artists who do just that. There is a process similar to the old DIY pcb process that removes everything from a printing plate but the inverse type faces. They then use those plates for platen printing.

]]>
By: Steven-X https://hackaday.com/2025/10/20/word-processing-heavy-metal-style/#comment-8196871 Mon, 20 Oct 2025 19:56:38 +0000 https://hackaday.com/?p=868668#comment-8196871 In reply to Snarkenstein.

As a kid we toured his house (mid-1970’s), and they had a machine on display. It was cool, and they mentioned it was a failure. The only other things I recall as a small room for a telephone (like a phone booth built into a wall) and his pool table.

]]>
By: Joe Piche https://hackaday.com/2025/10/20/word-processing-heavy-metal-style/#comment-8196846 Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:37:16 +0000 https://hackaday.com/?p=868668#comment-8196846 A fascinating look at the last days of the Linotype at the New York times. Look up “Farewell Etaoin Shrdlu (1980)” on the you tubes (I don’t know if i can post links)

]]>
By: CityZen https://hackaday.com/2025/10/20/word-processing-heavy-metal-style/#comment-8196837 Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:10:26 +0000 https://hackaday.com/?p=868668#comment-8196837 I think there’s a word missing here:

A mechanism pushed them up until the line of type between the margins.

…until the line of type fit between the margins?

Btw, I wonder what happened when you needed even more space than the space bands provided?

]]>
By: Stephen Keller https://hackaday.com/2025/10/20/word-processing-heavy-metal-style/#comment-8196834 Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:03:27 +0000 https://hackaday.com/?p=868668#comment-8196834 It seems to me that these days one could produce small-run press plates with a 3D printer.

]]>